New Theories about the Titanic
 
Advertise Here
Trending Topics:
Monday, January 26, 2015

Ship Equipment
Ship Maintenance
Unitor
Ship Systems
Bimco
Worldwide Metric
Portvision
Hydroscan
Freeman Marine
Neptune Group

MarineTalk
Home Page
About MarineTalk
Buyer's Guide
World InfoDesk
Discussion Forums
Advisory Board
FAQ
Advertising Information
Submit Company Listing
Edit Company Listing
Site Map
 
MarineTalk Site Search:
Featured Companies

SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings
SSPC is a non-profit professional society concerned with the use of coatings to protect industrial steel structures. The Society serves its members and advances the industry through standards, regulatory advocacy, education, and information exchange.
    USA Pennsylvania

Energy Group, The
Reduce Fuel Costs (10%-35%)& Emissions to 96% (including bio-fuels). One yr money back perf. guarantee. min. 10 yr product warranty. NEVER failed to produce results when done by the instructions. Paybacks 1-2 yrs or less.
    USA New Jersey

Institute of Destination Architects and Designers
International Professional Body of Destination Design and Coastal/Hydroscape Architects
    USA Virginia

CEDA - Central Dredging Association
CEDA, an independent, non-profit, non-governmental, professional society, aims to provide a forum for all those involved with any kind of activity related to dredging and marine construction and who live or work in Europe, Africa or the Middle-East.
    Netherlands

New Theories about the Titanic

      2/22/2006

A recent expedition to the wreckage of the Titanic led to a shocking discovery. "This ship didn't split apart because it sank," said John Chatterton, a co-host of the History Channel's "Deep Sea Detectives." "It sank because it split apart. And if you're the person onboard a ship, having it split apart is even scarier than having it slowly sink." Chatterton and his co-host, Richie Kohler, set out on an expedition to research the legendary ocean liner last summer. They encountered two huge sections of the bottom 60 feet by 90 feet from the area where the ship had split in two. That led to a new theory about how the Titanic had sunk.

Using Russian deep-sea submersibles, the expedition was on its final day with no sign of its target: the ship's massive bottom structure, called the keel. So Kohler and Chatterton headed to a remote debris field. With the clock running out, they were shocked by what they found. The usual explanation of the Titanic disaster says the ship, which was traveling from Southampton (England) to New York City, hit an iceberg on its right side, which opened a huge gash. As the front filled with water, the rear flew high in the air, as seen in James Cameron's movie "Titanic." The expedition says the new evidence paints a different picture. The ship also tore open its bottom against the submerged section of the iceberg. As it filled with water from the side and below, it was literally ripped apart by the opposing forces.

The result, Kohler and Chatterton say, was that the ship sank even faster than the crew had expected. In similar accidents, ships had stayed afloat for several hours, allowing enough time for passengers to be rescued. But the Titanic and most of its passengers were lost in two hours. If Kohler and Chatterton are correct, the speed at which the Titanic sank had a huge effect on how many people survived.


ABC News  


You may also like:
Trending Technology, World Shipping & Maritime News





Latest Marine News and Technology Articles | Maritime 2015 Buyer's Guide





MarineTalk

E-mail:  Contact Us

Copyright 1998 - 2015 MarineTalk
Division of Link Internet Business Solutions
All rights reserved.

The reproduction, retrieval, copying or transmission of this Web site content,
in whole or in part, is not permitted without the express permission of
MarineTalk .