Shipbuilding Crisis Continues
 
Advertise Here
Trending Topics:
Sunday, June 14, 2015

Ship Equipment
Ship Maintenance
Unitor
Ship Systems
Bimco
Worldwide Metric
Portvision
Hydroscan
Freeman Marine
Neptune Group

MarineTalk
Home Page
About MarineTalk
Buyer's Guide
World InfoDesk
Discussion Forums
Advisory Board
FAQ
Advertising Information
Submit Company Listing
Edit Company Listing
Site Map
 
MarineTalk Site Search:
Featured Companies

FIATA - International Federation of Freight Forwarders Ass.
FIATA, the International Freight Forwarders Association, a non-governmental organization, represents today an industry covering approx. 40'000 forwarding firms, also known as the "Architects of Transport", employing around 8 - 10 million people.
    Switzerland

BU-IL Corporation
BIP is the largest marine & offshore panel, marine fire rated doors, and prefabricated unit toilet manufacturer in the world.
    Korea

Royal Institution of Naval Architects
The Royal Institution of Naval Architects is an internationally renowned professional institution whose members are involved at all levels in the design, construction, repair and operation of ships, boats and marine structures worldwide.
    United Kingdom

International Marine Purchasing Association
As a truly international organization, IMPA exists for both the marine purchaser and supplier alike and our membership is categorized as Full and Corporate for Purchasers and Associate for suppliers.
    United Kingdom

Shipbuilding Crisis Continues

      5/30/2007

Shipbuilding Crisis Continues

Despite positive steps taken by the US Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), shipbuilding remains in a critical state. By fencing the Ship Construction Navy (SCN) budget and laying out a 30-year ship construction blueprint, the CNO has taken two dramatic steps essential to stability and efficiency for both the Department of the Navy and the industrial base. However, there are serious problems in the execution of this plan. If these problems are not recognized and resolved soon, shipbuilding will slide back into a morass of unrealistic expectations and budget overruns that will lead to inadequate force structure.

The 30-year plan is not constructed with a view toward shipbuilding efficiency. Advice from industry was not sought in constructing the plan. The significant advantages of batch procurement (buying several ships in the same budget year rather than spreading them out over several years, a lesson from the 1980s) have not been incorporated. The Department of the Navy could get more ships for less money. Even with a redesigned plan, there are funding shortfalls if the goal of 313 ships is to be achieved.

The move toward over-reliance on contracting on a “cost plus” basis is fraught with peril. For the Navy customer, it seriously reduces internal discipline in introducing new requirements, confounds accurate budget planning, and circumvents the necessity of careful packaging of preplanned improvements in the construction process. It also encourages laxity on the part of contractors in properly managing costs. These are more lessons from the DDG, CVN, LHD, and SSN programs of the 1980s. Cost-plus contracting might be appropriate for new combat systems, but ships are multi-year construction projects that are not amenable to the use of this contracting method in other than “medium- to high-risk” endeavors such as the lead ship of a multi-year program.

It has been suggested to form an industrial advisory team and rework the 30-year shipbuilding plan addressing the following:

  • Re-examine actual funding requirements and campaign for SCN funds to meet those requirements. Lobby for a realistic funding profile significantly greater than current projections. This will require building consensus that naval forces will play a major role in future overseas presence and crisis control.
  • Begin, and then maintain, a modernization and service life extension program for select surface combatants.
  • While improvements to current contracting policies might be appropriate, review the painful lessons of the past before committing to over-reliance on “cost-plus” contracting for ship construction.
  • Draw on the lessons from the 1980s in contracting for multi-year ship production and instilling discipline as new requirements and improvements are added.
  • Take a hard look at actual Marine Corps forcible-entry requirements and develop a practical mix of black and grey hulls.


Military.com  


You may also like:
Trending Technology, World Shipping & Maritime News





Latest Marine News and Technology Articles | Maritime 2015 Buyer's Guide





MarineTalk

E-mail:  Contact Us

Copyright © 1998 - 2015 MarineTalk
Division of Link Internet Business Solutions
All rights reserved.

The reproduction, retrieval, copying or transmission of this Web site content,
in whole or in part, is not permitted without the express permission of
MarineTalk .