US Navy Future
Advertise Here
Trending Topics:
Sunday, June 14, 2015

Ship Equipment
Ship Maintenance
Ship Systems
Worldwide Metric
Freeman Marine
Neptune Group

Home Page
About MarineTalk
Buyer's Guide
World InfoDesk
Discussion Forums
Advisory Board
Advertising Information
Submit Company Listing
Edit Company Listing
Site Map
MarineTalk Site Search:
Featured Companies

Prince William Sound Community College
The PWSCC Training Department exists to provide developmental academic and vocational education, training, and community interest courses to its service community, focusing on Oil Spill Management and Safety Management.
    USA Alaska

Hanseatic Marine Training School
A marine training school situated in Cyprus providing training facilities to the marine industry. Training at all levels excluding national licenses, the school specialises in pre-sea and rating training and "specialised short courses".

HODT Korrosionsschutz GmbH
Anti-Corrosion products - Consulting, Service & Sale Ballasttank-protection, wire rope dressings, wire rope luibricator, soft coatings, semi hard coatings, 1-K-Polyurethan Coatings

CEFOR - Central Union of Marine Underwriters
The objective of the Central Union of Marine Underwriters (CEFOR)is to promote and safeguard the professional and economic interests of its members within hull, energy and cargo insurance.

US Navy Future


US Navy Future

As the US Navy appears set to fix the future shape of its fleet, dissenting voices are beginning to be heard. Should it continue on its hi-tech course, creating battle groups based around the new generation of nuclear supercarriers? Should it develop an entirely new kind of "dumb" missile-launching warship? Or should it create a "cheap and cheerful" fleet of frigates to help it maintain its fleet of 300 warships?

The options must be examined against three major factors which threaten the balance of international naval power. One, the emerging ability of more potentially hostile nations to detect and hit warships, Exocet-style, up to 50 miles out to sea. Two, the growing cost of equipping, staffing and operating carrier battle groups, which can cost 50 per cent again of the construction costs of a carrier to run each year. And three - probably the real enemy as far as America is concerned - a crippling manpower shortage.

Educational standards are being lowered all the time to attract more men. But the navy's manpower problem has become so acute that crew reductions of up to 70 per cent are being sought in specifications for the new destroyer-class DD-21.

aircraft carrier.jpg (19990 bytes)

The answer, according to one influential commentator, is relatively low-tech. Andrew Krepinevich, executive director of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, suggests staying with the carrier-building programme for now, but urgently examining other options. He wants the navy to resurrect plans to build arsenal warships, stealth vessels which can strike furtively at enemy targets but which, with a skeleton crew of just 50, could be sitting ducks for an enemy attack. He would also like it to take some of its fleet of Polaris nuclear submarines out of storage and convert them into cruise missile carriers.

Full article: Electronic Telegraph


You may also like:
Trending Technology, World Shipping & Maritime News

Latest Marine News and Technology Articles | Maritime 2015 Buyer's Guide


E-mail:  Contact Us

Copyright 1998 - 2015 MarineTalk
Division of Link Internet Business Solutions
All rights reserved.

The reproduction, retrieval, copying or transmission of this Web site content,
in whole or in part, is not permitted without the express permission of
MarineTalk .